<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alert: Google+ Security for Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yellowrosewebdesign.com/2011/12/alert-google-security-for-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://yellowrosewebdesign.com/2011/12/alert-google-security-for-women/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:54:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>https://yellowrosewebdesign.com/2011/12/alert-google-security-for-women/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yellowrosewebdesign.com/?p=308#comment-411</guid>
		<description>My friend, you don&#039;t need to apologize for the actions of others. I wrote the article because I&#039;m quite perplexed not only by the behavior but why it&#039;s so prevalent on Google+? These men are seeking out (practically spamming) women and circling them without even finding out anything about them. And for no other reason than that we&#039;re women!? Not exactly the kind of guy I think any woman would be interested in. 

I certainly didn&#039;t mean to take out my frustrations on the thoughtful, considerate men of Google+ ... of which there are many! I saw this quote recently and I believe it fits their unique situation (paraphrasing because I don&#039;t recall the exact wording): &quot;Don&#039;t try so hard to be interesting, but be &lt;strong&gt;interested &lt;/strong&gt; instead.&quot;

Thanks for reading and commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend, you don&#8217;t need to apologize for the actions of others. I wrote the article because I&#8217;m quite perplexed not only by the behavior but why it&#8217;s so prevalent on Google+? These men are seeking out (practically spamming) women and circling them without even finding out anything about them. And for no other reason than that we&#8217;re women!? Not exactly the kind of guy I think any woman would be interested in. </p>
<p>I certainly didn&#8217;t mean to take out my frustrations on the thoughtful, considerate men of Google+ &#8230; of which there are many! I saw this quote recently and I believe it fits their unique situation (paraphrasing because I don&#8217;t recall the exact wording): &#8220;Don&#8217;t try so hard to be interesting, but be <strong>interested </strong> instead.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for reading and commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>https://yellowrosewebdesign.com/2011/12/alert-google-security-for-women/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 21:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yellowrosewebdesign.com/?p=308#comment-406</guid>
		<description>My apologies to all for the boorish behavior of many in my gender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies to all for the boorish behavior of many in my gender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
